While it’s hard enough paying back student loans, many borrowers are stuck with debt from schools that defrauded them.
However, the Department of Education says borrowers should not have to pay back student loans if their school defrauded them. And now we are seeing the federal agency’s proposed changes to the borrower defense to repayment rule.
Ultimately, these changes should make it easier for students to have federal direct student loans discharged if they are owed to a school that engaged in fraudulent activity.
Defense to repayment rule as it stands today
The current borrower defense to repayment rule says that borrowers may only have their debts discharged if it can be proven that the school violated the laws of the state.
For instance, perhaps a school used illegal or deceptive tactics in violation of state law to persuade students to borrow money for higher education. These students can apply to have their federal loans discharged.
However, according to The Washington Post, the borrower defense to repayment rule was rarely used until the 2014 collapse of the Corinthian Colleges for-profit chain. This set off an avalanche of claims sent to the U.S. Department of Education.
The federal agency was forced to take steps to fix the system and create a new standard for students to seek debt relief from federal student loans. This is the reform we are now seeing proposed.
“Students who are defrauded deserve an efficient, transparent and fair process to get the loan relief to which they are legally entitled,” says Secretary of Education John B. King Jr in The Washington Post. “And schools that harm their students should be on the hook for the damage.”
How proposed changes would make things easier
In June 2016, the Department of Education published the Unofficial Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to Amend Direct Loan Program Regulations on Borrower Defense.
The proposed rules are open for public comment until August 1, 2016. It will then be published on November 1, 2016, and is expected to go into effect by July 1, 2017.
However, these changes will not apply to federal student loans retroactively.
That means revisions will only be applicable to federal student loans taken out on or after July 1, 2017. Federal student loans that were taken out before July 1, 2017, will be subject to the rule as it stands today.
New qualifying circumstances for defense to repayment
If the proposed rules are instituted as is, borrowers may claim the borrower defense to repayment rule under three new circumstances.
1. If a court of law finds the school guilty of violating state or federal law.
This takes the burden of proof off of the student, as a court has already determined the school to be in violation.
For instance, in October 2015, Corinthian Colleges was found liable for a host of violations. This resulted in a $530 million judgment.
2. If the school commits a breach of contract.
As stated in the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, “a breach of contract borrower defense may be raised where a school has failed to deliver specific obligations, such as programs and services, it has committed to by contract.”
Contracts may include enrollment agreements, as well as catalogs, bulletins, circulars, student handbooks, and school regulations.
3. If the school misrepresents something that the student used as the basis for their decision to attend.
The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking states that the borrower defense may be applicable to “misrepresentations about its facilities, financial charges, programs, or employability of its graduates.”
Withholding of information such as this could also be considered misrepresentation.
No more red tape
Currently, schools are able to delay and prevent the student complaint process.
However, the new regulations attached to the defense to repayment would do the following:
- Prevent schools from requiring that students first engage in a school’s internal complaint process before contacting accrediting and government agencies about the complaint
- Prohibit the use of predispute mandatory arbitration agreements by schools
- Prohibit the use of class action lawsuit waivers
- Require schools to disclose to and notify the [Education] Secretary of arbitration filings
How you would make a claim
Under the proposed changes, all qualifying claims would be submitted to and handled by the Student Aid Enforcement Unit at the Federal Student Aid office.
There would be no statute of limitations on making a claim for discharge. However, a qualifying claim must be made while the borrower still has an outstanding student loan balance.
If a borrower wants to be reimbursed for student loan payments already made, they must submit the claim within 6 years of the violation. The only exception to this rule is if the claim being made is based on a court finding.
What do you think?
The Department of Education wants to know what you think of their proposed changes to the borrower defense to repayment rule.
If you would like to share your thoughts, the proposed rules are open for public comment until August 1, 2016. Comments received will be considered before the final publication of the rule in November. The new borrower defense to repayment rule will go into effect next year.
Hopefully, you will never find yourself in a situation requiring such a claim be made. But it’s good to know reform is on the way for borrowers who need it.
Interested in refinancing student loans?Here are the top 6 lenders of 2018!
|Lender||Rates (APR)||Eligible Degrees|
|Get real rates from up to 4 Lenders at once
Check out the testimonials and our in-depth reviews!
|2.63% – 7.75%||Undergrad & Graduate||Visit SoFi|
|2.57% – 6.32%||Undergrad & Graduate||Visit Earnest|
|2.80% – 7.02%||Undergrad & Graduate||Visit Laurel Road|
|2.68% – 8.79%||Undergrad & Graduate||Visit Lendkey|
|2.57% – 6.65%||Undergrad & Graduate||Visit CommonBond|
|2.62% – 8.69%||Undergrad & Graduate||Visit Citizens|